American Waves
  Diversity in America
  Ceremonies/Festivities
  Eye on the High Court
  Fathers of Faith
  Footsteps of Lincoln
  Genes & Biotechnology
  Impacts
  Media in Review
  Millennial Moments
  Peoples of the World
  Poetry
  Profiles in Character
  Scientists: Past & Present
  Speech & Debate
  The U.S. Constitution
  Traveling the Globe
  Worldwide Folktales
  World of Nature
  Writers & Writing
 

National Forensic League
Policy Debate
(2005 - 2006)


Resolved: The United States federal government should substantially decrease its authority either to detain without charge or to search without probable cause.

Given the times we live in, this is a critical debate issue, for it pits two "human rights" against one another: the right to a peaceful, well-protected society, and the right to privacy and freedom from unreasonable detention.

In an era of growing terrorist threat, it seems vital for law enforcers to have not only the tools but also unprecedented latitude to combat radical forces. By this line of reasoning, lawmen need greater search, surveillance, and detention powers.

Not so fast! cry critics, however. Lawmen, they say, are already well equipped technologically and legally to root out terrorists. No further expansion of their powers is necessary, for to do so will only diminish liberty in our land.

This collection will provide you with powerful factual ammunition for whichever side you take on the above resolution. Just click on the categories to find the information you need.






U.S. Security
Privacy and Rights
Government Powers
Terrorism
Surveillance
Intervention
Detainment
Immigration
Cases and Rulings
International Issues

 
About Us  |  Contact Us  |  FAQ  |  Terms of Use  I   Privacy Policy
Copyright 2017 The World & I Online. All rights reserved.